PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGT vs. STIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGT vs. STIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Target Corporation (TGT) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGT achieves a 30.19% return, which is significantly higher than STIP's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, TGT has outperformed STIP with an annualized return of 9.40%, while STIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.18% annualized return.


TGT

1D
1.32%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
30.19%
6M
39.97%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
-8.89%
10Y*
9.40%

STIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGT vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGT
Target Corporation
30.19%-24.50%-2.27%-1.35%-34.24%32.91%40.47%100.17%4.67%-5.84%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.04%6.03%4.77%4.63%-3.02%5.68%5.18%4.89%0.54%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TGT and STIP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2010

0.01

The correlation between TGT and STIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGT vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGT
TGT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGT vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Corporation (TGT) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGTSTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.69

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

6.76

-4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

26.37

-22.18

TGT vs. STIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the STIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGT and STIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGTSTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

3.23

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

1.23

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

1.30

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.07

-0.72

Drawdowns

TGT vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGT drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGT and STIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGTSTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.40%

-5.50%

-58.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.27%

-0.69%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.78%

-0.95%

-48.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.40%

-5.50%

-58.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.40%

-5.50%

-58.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.86%

-0.03%

-45.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.08%

-0.99%

-16.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.62%

0.18%

+8.44%

Volatility

TGT vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison

Target Corporation (TGT) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that TGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGTSTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

0.40%

+10.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.01%

0.99%

+20.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.44%

1.46%

+28.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.44%

2.75%

+32.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.25%

2.45%

+30.80%

Dividends

TGT vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison

TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than STIP's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.30%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%0.00%
TGT
Target Corporation
3.65%4.62%3.28%3.06%2.66%1.37%1.52%2.03%3.81%3.74%3.21%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGT and STIP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGT has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to STIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGT dropped -64.40% vs STIP's -5.50%.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGT and STIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer