TGT vs. GRC
TGT (Target Corporation) and GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) are both stocks. TGT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while GRC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, TGT returned 10.20%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for GRC. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TGT vs. GRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGT achieves a 50.73% return, which is significantly lower than GRC's 70.94% return. Over the past 10 years, TGT has underperformed GRC with an annualized return of 10.20%, while GRC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.
TGT
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 39.70%
- YTD
- 50.73%
- 1Y
- 50.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- -8.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.54%
GRC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- 6M
- 49.80%
- YTD
- 70.94%
- 1Y
- 100.02%
- 3Y*
- 38.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.01M | $17.85M | $14.41M | |
| $431.21M | $508.68M | $632.93M |
TGT vs. GRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGT Target Corporation | 50.73% | -24.50% | -2.27% | -1.35% | -34.24% | 32.91% | 40.47% | 100.17% | 4.67% | -5.84% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 70.94% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGT and GRC is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.27 |
The correlation between TGT and GRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TGT:
$65.62B
GRC:
$2.14B
TGT:
$7.93
GRC:
$2.37
TGT:
18.22
GRC:
34.27
TGT:
0.62
GRC:
3.04
TGT:
4.02
GRC:
4.85
TGT:
$105.47B
GRC:
$702.05M
TGT:
$27.05B
GRC:
$214.56M
TGT:
$8.20B
GRC:
$129.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGT vs. GRC — Risk / Return Rank
TGT
GRC
TGT vs. GRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Corporation (TGT) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGT | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.44 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 6.75 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.07 | 17.21 | -11.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGT vs. GRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGT drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, roughly equal to the maximum GRC drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGT and GRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGT | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.40% | -67.23% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.58% | -14.90% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.78% | -26.87% | -22.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.40% | -49.26% | -15.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.40% | -49.26% | -15.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.31% | -11.50% | -25.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.17% | -17.59% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 5.83% | +2.44% |
Volatility
TGT vs. GRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Target Corporation (TGT) is 8.19%, while The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that TGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGT | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 12.13% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.84% | 30.07% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.72% | 35.80% | -5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.90% | 31.19% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.49% | 34.00% | -0.51% |
Dividends
TGT vs. GRC - Dividend Comparison
TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than GRC's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.93% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
TGT Target Corporation | 3.16% | 4.62% | 3.28% | 3.06% | 2.66% | 1.37% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 3.81% | 3.74% | 3.21% | 2.97% |
Financials
TGT vs. GRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Target Corporation and The Gorman-Rupp Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TGT vs. GRC - Profitability Comparison
TGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Target Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.46B and revenue of 24.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 63.69M and revenue of 186.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.
TGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Target Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30B and revenue of 24.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 30.41M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
TGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Target Corporation reported a net income of 942.00M and revenue of 24.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 19.43M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TGT and GRC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRC has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to TGT (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGT dropped -64.40% vs GRC's -67.23%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGT and GRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer