PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COST vs. MA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COST and MA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

COST vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Mastercard Inc (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2,455.62%
12,459.58%
COST
MA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COST:

2.60

MA:

1.69

Sortino Ratio

COST:

3.20

MA:

2.28

Omega Ratio

COST:

1.46

MA:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

COST:

4.72

MA:

2.25

Martin Ratio

COST:

12.17

MA:

5.58

Ulcer Index

COST:

3.98%

MA:

4.77%

Daily Std Dev

COST:

18.66%

MA:

15.78%

Max Drawdown

COST:

-53.39%

MA:

-62.67%

Current Drawdown

COST:

-4.08%

MA:

-1.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COST:

$435.99B

MA:

$487.38B

EPS

COST:

$16.98

MA:

$13.20

PE Ratio

COST:

57.84

MA:

40.23

PEG Ratio

COST:

5.99

MA:

2.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

COST:

$258.81B

MA:

$27.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COST:

$32.80B

MA:

$23.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

COST:

$12.25B

MA:

$16.44B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 45.38% return, which is significantly higher than MA's 24.52% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed MA with an annualized return of 23.42%, while MA has yielded a comparatively lower 20.46% annualized return.


COST

YTD

45.38%

1M

2.80%

6M

12.78%

1Y

47.55%

5Y*

28.68%

10Y*

23.42%

MA

YTD

24.52%

1M

3.02%

6M

16.42%

1Y

25.42%

5Y*

12.73%

10Y*

20.46%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COST vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Mastercard Inc (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.601.69
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.202.28
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.461.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 4.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.722.25
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 12.17, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0012.175.58
COST
MA

The current COST Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the MA Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST and MA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.60
1.69
COST
MA

Dividends

COST vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than MA's 0.50% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.04%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%
MA
Mastercard Inc
0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%0.51%0.25%

Drawdowns

COST vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum MA drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and MA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.08%
-1.20%
COST
MA

Volatility

COST vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Mastercard Inc (MA) at 4.08%. This indicates that COST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.84%
4.08%
COST
MA

Financials

COST vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Mastercard Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab