COST vs. MA
Compare and contrast key facts about Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Mastercard Inc (MA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COST or MA.
Key characteristics
| COST | MA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.05% | 4.31% |
| 1Y Return | 56.22% | 18.63% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 27.48% | 6.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 27.17% | 12.97% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 23.44% | 20.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.14 | 1.17 |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.01% | 16.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -70.95% | -62.67% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.15% | -9.10% |
Fundamentals
| COST | MA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $329.92B | $410.05B |
| EPS | $15.25 | $12.60 |
| PE Ratio | 48.78 | 35.20 |
| PEG Ratio | 5.15 | 1.56 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $248.83B | $25.70B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $30.10B | $22.24B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $11.07B | $15.75B |
Correlation
The correlation between COST and MA is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
COST vs. MA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly higher than MA's 4.31% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed MA with an annualized return of 23.44%, while MA has yielded a comparatively lower 20.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COST vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Mastercard Inc (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COST vs. MA - Dividend Comparison
COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than MA's 0.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.58% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
MA Mastercard Inc | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.51% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
COST vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -70.95%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and MA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COST vs. MA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is 3.89%, while Mastercard Inc (MA) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that COST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
COST vs. MA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Mastercard Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities