PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRNX vs. BILDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TGRNX vs. BILDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TGRNX vs. BILDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
-0.39%6.76%3.08%5.73%-13.43%-0.60%8.57%9.15%1.43%
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
-0.38%7.59%4.41%8.89%-11.54%0.14%5.48%8.30%1.21%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TGRNX having a -0.39% return and BILDX slightly higher at -0.38%.


TGRNX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
0.25%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*

BILDX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
0.12%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.56%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TGRNX vs. BILDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BILDX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TGRNX vs. BILDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRNX
TGRNX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TGRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BILDX
BILDX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRNX vs. BILDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGRNXBILDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

1.82

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.89

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.76

6.27

+0.49

TGRNX vs. BILDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the BILDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRNX and BILDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGRNXBILDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.38

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.72

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between TGRNX and BILDX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TGRNX vs. BILDX - Dividend Comparison

TGRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than BILDX's 4.45% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
3.97%4.31%4.48%3.30%2.69%2.76%4.20%4.38%0.43%0.00%
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
4.45%4.64%4.11%3.42%3.31%3.45%2.89%3.40%3.18%3.22%

Drawdowns

TGRNX vs. BILDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRNX drawdown since its inception was -17.85%, which is greater than BILDX's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRNX and BILDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRNXBILDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-15.68%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-2.43%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.85%

-15.68%

-2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.90%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-3.03%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.73%

-0.03%

Volatility

TGRNX vs. BILDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) is 1.14%, while DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that TGRNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BILDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TGRNXBILDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.38%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

2.09%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

3.47%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

4.39%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

4.11%

+0.73%