TGPCX vs. PUDZX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TGPCX (TCW Conservative Allocation Fund) and PUDZX (PGIM Real Assets Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TGPCX returned 5.90%/yr vs 6.81%/yr for PUDZX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGPCX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PUDZX.

Performance

TGPCX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Conservative Allocation Fund (TGPCX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGPCX achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, TGPCX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 5.90%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.81% annualized return.

TGPCX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 4.73%
• 6M: 4.82%
• 1Y: 10.35%
• 3Y*: 9.62%
• 5Y*: 4.01%
• 10Y*: 5.90%

PUDZX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -2.11%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 6M: 12.79%
• 1Y: 20.93%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 7.88%
• 10Y*: 6.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGPCX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TGPCX TCW Conservative Allocation Fund	4.73%	9.17%	4.10%	16.54%	-15.22%	8.45%	14.24%	14.83%	-3.10%	8.83%
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	12.42%	13.40%	8.61%	3.26%	-2.76%	18.49%	4.84%	16.29%	-9.20%	6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TGPCX and PUDZX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.64

The correlation between TGPCX and PUDZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TGPCX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGPCX

TGPCX Risk / Return Rank: 43
TGPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TGPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
TGPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
TGPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TGPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

PUDZX

PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 90
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGPCX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Conservative Allocation Fund (TGPCX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGPCX	PUDZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.94	-1.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	4.01	-1.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.55	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	6.20	-3.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.03	23.29	-13.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGPCX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGPCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGPCX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGPCX	PUDZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.94	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.75	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.70	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.54	+0.17

Drawdowns

TGPCX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGPCX drawdown since its inception was -21.03%, roughly equal to the maximum PUDZX drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGPCX and PUDZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGPCX	PUDZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.03%	-21.53%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.43%	-3.56%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.12%	-8.20%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.27%	-17.98%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.27%	-21.53%	+1.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.64%	+2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-5.26%	+2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	0.95%	+0.11%

Volatility

TGPCX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Conservative Allocation Fund (TGPCX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) have volatilities of 2.02% and 1.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGPCX	PUDZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	1.93%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.50%	6.09%	-1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.52%	7.52%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.92%	10.54%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.69%	9.70%	-2.01%

TGPCX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGPCX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGPCX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

TGPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than PUDZX's 7.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	7.77%	8.93%	6.67%	3.66%	9.10%	13.00%	4.94%	3.40%	2.14%	2.10%	1.39%	1.72%
TGPCX TCW Conservative Allocation Fund	4.38%	4.58%	7.42%	3.00%	4.86%	9.89%	1.47%	7.04%	6.71%	4.24%	6.84%	3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGPCX and PUDZX in my portfolio?

TGPCX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TGPCX or PUDZX?

TGPCX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to PUDZX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGPCX dropped -21.03% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.