TGPCX vs. HCVAX
TGPCX (TCW Conservative Allocation Fund) and HCVAX (Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TGPCX returned 5.96%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for HCVAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TGPCX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for HCVAX.
Performance
TGPCX vs. HCVAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGPCX achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than HCVAX's 4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, TGPCX has outperformed HCVAX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while HCVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.
TGPCX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 9.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
HCVAX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
TGPCX vs. HCVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGPCX TCW Conservative Allocation Fund | 4.90% | 9.17% | 4.10% | 16.54% | -15.22% | 8.45% | 14.24% | 14.83% | -3.10% | 8.83% |
HCVAX Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund | 4.53% | 11.09% | 8.52% | 9.63% | -13.42% | 5.38% | 8.75% | 13.79% | -3.78% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGPCX and HCVAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.88 |
The correlation between TGPCX and HCVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGPCX vs. HCVAX — Risk / Return Rank
TGPCX
HCVAX
TGPCX vs. HCVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Conservative Allocation Fund (TGPCX) and Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund (HCVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGPCX | HCVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.57 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 11.56 | -2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGPCX vs. HCVAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGPCX drawdown since its inception was -21.03%, smaller than the maximum HCVAX drawdown of -31.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGPCX and HCVAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGPCX | HCVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.03% | -31.09% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.43% | -4.67% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.12% | -6.41% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.27% | -18.45% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.27% | -18.45% | -1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.16% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -3.72% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 1.04% | +0.04% |
Volatility
TGPCX vs. HCVAX - Volatility Comparison
TCW Conservative Allocation Fund (TGPCX) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund (HCVAX) at 2.28%. This indicates that TGPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGPCX | HCVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 2.28% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 4.79% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.83% | 5.81% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.97% | 6.98% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.72% | 6.75% | +0.97% |
TGPCX vs. HCVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGPCX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than HCVAX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGPCX vs. HCVAX - Dividend Comparison
TGPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than HCVAX's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCVAX Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund | 3.05% | 3.19% | 2.95% | 2.54% | 2.52% | 4.72% | 1.51% | 2.52% | 3.22% | 3.01% | 1.35% | 1.66% |
TGPCX TCW Conservative Allocation Fund | 4.37% | 4.58% | 7.42% | 3.00% | 4.86% | 9.89% | 1.47% | 7.04% | 6.71% | 4.24% | 6.84% | 3.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TGPCX and HCVAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TGPCX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to HCVAX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGPCX dropped -21.03% vs HCVAX's -31.09%.
HCVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGPCX and HCVAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer