TGLMX vs. AMFIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX).

TGLMX is managed by TCW. It was launched on Jun 17, 1993. AMFIX is managed by AAMA. It was launched on Jun 30, 2017.

Performance

TGLMX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TGLMX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund	0.57%	8.99%	1.82%	5.05%	-16.59%	-1.05%	8.32%	7.28%	0.80%	-0.20%
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund	0.21%	3.74%	3.48%	3.84%	-6.26%	-1.37%	2.24%	2.47%	0.89%	-0.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLMX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than AMFIX's 0.21% return.

TGLMX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: 5.74%
• 3Y*: 4.22%
• 5Y*: -0.02%
• 10Y*: 1.54%

AMFIX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 0.21%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 2.97%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGLMX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLMX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.

AMFIX

AAMA Income Fund

TGLMX

TCW Total Return Bond Fund

Return for Risk

TGLMX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLMX

TGLMX Risk / Return Rank: 67
TGLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TGLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TGLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TGLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TGLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

AMFIX

AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLMX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGLMX	AMFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	3.05	-1.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	4.95	-3.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.69	-0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	4.18	-2.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	21.12	-15.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGLMX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLMX and AMFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGLMX	AMFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	3.05	-1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.34	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.56	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between TGLMX and AMFIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TGLMX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

TGLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund	6.39%	7.19%	6.52%	6.13%	3.27%	2.08%	3.37%	4.07%	3.55%	2.89%	4.13%	2.88%
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund	2.22%	2.08%	2.44%	1.70%	0.83%	0.57%	0.83%	1.24%	1.24%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TGLMX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLMX drawdown since its inception was -22.26%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLMX and AMFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGLMX	AMFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.26%	-9.35%	-12.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.28%	-0.74%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.17%	-8.91%	-13.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.38%	-0.49%	-2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-2.06%	-1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	0.15%	+0.96%

Volatility

TGLMX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that TGLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGLMX	AMFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.85%	0.48%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	0.72%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.02%	0.98%	+4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.03%	2.16%	+4.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.57%	1.75%	+3.82%