TGLB vs. INFL
TGLB (T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF) and INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, TGLB returned 13.13% vs 17.40% for INFL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TGLB charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for INFL.
Performance
TGLB vs. INFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TGLB having a 8.78% return and INFL slightly higher at 9.14%.
TGLB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFL
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 17.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- —
TGLB vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 8.78% | 3.99% |
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 9.14% | 7.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLB and INFL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.45 |
TGLB vs. INFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGLB
INFL
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
TGLB
INFL
-
Financial Services
TGLB
INFL
Communication Services
TGLB
INFL
Industrials
TGLB
INFL
Healthcare
TGLB
INFL
Consumer Cyclical
TGLB
INFL
-
Basic Materials
TGLB
INFL
Utilities
TGLB
INFL
Energy
TGLB
INFL
Consumer Defensive
TGLB
INFL
Real Estate
TGLB
-
INFL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLB vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank
TGLB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INFL
TGLB vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGLB | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGLB vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLB drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum INFL drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLB and INFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLB | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -21.30% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -12.20% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -12.02% | +8.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -5.14% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.73% | — |
Volatility
TGLB vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLB | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 16.25% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 17.79% | -3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 17.68% | -3.47% |
TGLB vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLB has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLB vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison
TGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than INFL's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 0.85% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 0.91% |
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLB and INFL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, INFL leads with 17.40% vs 13.13% for TGLB. On fees, TGLB is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INFL has performed better with a 17.40% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TGLB is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.
INFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.18% for TGLB.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TGLB and 0.85% for INFL.
Find the right allocation for TGLB and INFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer