TGGBX vs. GOBSX
TGGBX (TCW Global Bond Fund) and GOBSX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, TGGBX returned 1.04%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for GOBSX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGGBX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for GOBSX.
Performance
TGGBX vs. GOBSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGGBX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than GOBSX's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TGGBX has underperformed GOBSX with an annualized return of 1.04%, while GOBSX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.29% annualized return.
TGGBX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- -1.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.04%
GOBSX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- -1.64%
- 10Y*
- 1.29%
TGGBX vs. GOBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGGBX TCW Global Bond Fund | 0.35% | 10.17% | -2.27% | 7.01% | -17.09% | -4.71% | 12.29% | 8.36% | -1.75% | 6.02% |
GOBSX BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund | 2.43% | 13.59% | -9.38% | 7.42% | -15.66% | -5.27% | 12.66% | 9.21% | -5.59% | 11.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGGBX and GOBSX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012 | 0.68 |
The correlation between TGGBX and GOBSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGGBX vs. GOBSX — Risk / Return Rank
TGGBX
GOBSX
TGGBX vs. GOBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGGBX | GOBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 0.93 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 2.45 | -0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGGBX vs. GOBSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGGBX drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, smaller than the maximum GOBSX drawdown of -29.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGGBX and GOBSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGGBX | GOBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.37% | -29.04% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.16% | -5.10% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.55% | -13.81% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.20% | -27.90% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -29.04% | +1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.82% | -9.87% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.48% | -6.71% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.94% | -0.37% |
Volatility
TGGBX vs. GOBSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) is 1.54%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that TGGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGGBX | GOBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.73% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.10% | 5.54% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.13% | 7.00% | -1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.81% | 9.30% | -2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 8.51% | -2.71% |
TGGBX vs. GOBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGGBX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GOBSX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGGBX vs. GOBSX - Dividend Comparison
TGGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than GOBSX's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOBSX BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund | 4.02% | 4.28% | 3.80% | 0.09% | 6.70% | 2.30% | 0.31% | 1.56% | 3.15% | 3.68% | 1.87% | 2.61% |
TGGBX TCW Global Bond Fund | 4.16% | 4.12% | 2.99% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.93% | 3.70% | 4.18% | 0.50% | 1.88% | 2.91% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGGBX and GOBSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOBSX has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to TGGBX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGGBX dropped -27.37% vs GOBSX's -29.04%.
GOBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGGBX and GOBSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer