TGFRX vs. LSHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX).
TGFRX is managed by Tanaka. It was launched on Dec 30, 1998. LSHAX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on May 4, 2007.
Performance
TGFRX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TGFRX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | -3.59% | 39.56% | 17.98% | 50.24% | -22.62% | 26.54% | 50.87% | 18.78% | -25.18% | 7.28% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 50.22% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGFRX achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 50.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TGFRX has underperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 13.08%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.52% annualized return.
TGFRX
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- YTD
- -3.59%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 28.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
LSHAX
- 1D
- -7.12%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 50.22%
- 6M
- 41.09%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.40%
- 10Y*
- 19.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TGFRX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGFRX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TGFRX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank
TGFRX
LSHAX
TGFRX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGFRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.17 | +1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 0.53 | +1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.07 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 0.12 | +2.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 0.19 | +5.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGFRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.17 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.52 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.65 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.35 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between TGFRX and LSHAX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TGFRX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison
TGFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.51%, more than LSHAX's 7.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 13.51% | 13.02% | 6.89% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 7.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 7.71% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
TGFRX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGFRX drawdown since its inception was -95.35%, which is greater than LSHAX's maximum drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGFRX and LSHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGFRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.35% | -69.03% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.01% | -37.04% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.35% | -45.79% | -49.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.35% | -50.78% | -44.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.80% | -15.53% | -77.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.67% | -21.94% | -9.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 24.25% | -17.04% |
Volatility
TGFRX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison
Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) at 9.76%. This indicates that TGFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TGFRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.19% | 9.76% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.73% | 27.25% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.96% | 40.86% | -5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 793.45% | 33.69% | +759.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 561.16% | 30.16% | +531.00% |