TGFRX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
TGFRX is managed by Tanaka. It was launched on Dec 30, 1998. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | -3.59% | 39.56% | 17.98% | 50.24% | -22.62% | 26.54% | 50.87% | 18.78% | -25.18% | 7.28% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.15% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGFRX achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, TGFRX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 13.08%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.
TGFRX
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- YTD
- -3.59%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 28.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
FBGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGFRX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TGFRX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
TGFRX
FBGRX
TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGFRX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.91 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.43 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 1.36 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 5.44 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGFRX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.91 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.45 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.79 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.64 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between TGFRX and FBGRX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
TGFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.51%, more than FBGRX's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 13.51% | 13.02% | 6.89% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 7.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.14% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGFRX drawdown since its inception was -95.35%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGFRX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGFRX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.35% | -58.64% | -36.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.01% | -13.89% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.35% | -43.08% | -52.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.35% | -43.08% | -52.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.80% | -12.65% | -80.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.67% | -12.58% | -19.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 3.47% | +3.74% |
Volatility
TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.13%. This indicates that TGFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TGFRX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.19% | 6.13% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.73% | 13.36% | +10.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.96% | 24.63% | +10.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 793.45% | 24.86% | +768.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 561.16% | 23.59% | +537.57% |