TGFRX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TGFRX (Tanaka Growth Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - TGFRX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Tanaka, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, TGFRX returned 14.88%/yr vs 20.56%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TGFRX charges 2.19%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGFRX achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, TGFRX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 14.88%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.56% annualized return.

TGFRX

• 1D: 6.89%
• 1M: -2.05%
• 6M: 8.08%
• YTD: 14.28%
• 1Y: 44.09%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: 14.78%
• 10Y*: 14.88%
• ALL TIME*: 7.99%

FBGRX

• 1D: 3.14%
• 1M: -4.18%
• 6M: 10.25%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 1Y: 24.18%
• 3Y*: 25.20%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 20.56%
• ALL TIME*: 13.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund	14.28%	39.56%	17.98%	50.24%	-22.62%	26.54%	50.87%	18.78%	-25.18%	7.28%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	10.15%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TGFRX and FBGRX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	0.81

The correlation between TGFRX and FBGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TGFRX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGFRX

TGFRX Risk / Return Rank: 50
TGFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
TGFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TGFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
TGFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TGFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 40
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TGFRX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.09	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	1.58	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.19	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	1.73	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.08	6.19	-0.11

TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGFRX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGFRX drawdown since its inception was -74.43%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGFRX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGFRX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.43%	-58.64%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.01%	-12.65%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.68%	-27.07%	-34.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.68%	-43.08%	-18.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.68%	-43.08%	-18.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.72%	-7.79%	-21.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.60%	-12.49%	-17.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	3.54%	+3.09%

Volatility

TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.56%. This indicates that TGFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGFRX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.98%	6.56%	+4.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.61%	16.09%	+8.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.03%	20.05%	+11.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.33%	25.24%	+37.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.55%	23.83%	+23.72%

TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGFRX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGFRX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

TGFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than FBGRX's 1.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.72%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund	11.39%	13.02%	6.89%	0.00%	0.11%	7.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGFRX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

TGFRX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TGFRX or FBGRX?

TGFRX has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to FBGRX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGFRX dropped -74.43% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TGFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.