PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGFRX vs. FMDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TGFRX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TGFRX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TGFRX
Tanaka Growth Fund
2.11%39.56%17.98%50.24%-22.62%26.54%50.87%5.92%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
-6.36%8.60%22.03%25.79%-26.67%12.67%34.84%4.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGFRX achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's -6.36% return.


TGFRX

1D
5.92%
1M
-7.38%
YTD
2.11%
6M
3.42%
1Y
38.93%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
13.73%

FMDGX

1D
3.60%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
-6.36%
6M
-9.60%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TGFRX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGFRX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TGFRX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGFRX
TGFRX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TGFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TGFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FMDGX
FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGFRX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGFRXFMDGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.41

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

0.76

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.10

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

0.63

+2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.48

1.97

+5.51

TGFRX vs. FMDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the FMDGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGFRX and FMDGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGFRXFMDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.41

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.22

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.38

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between TGFRX and FMDGX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TGFRX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison

TGFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than FMDGX's 1.98% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TGFRX
Tanaka Growth Fund
12.75%13.02%6.89%0.00%0.11%7.44%0.00%0.00%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
1.98%1.85%0.47%0.63%0.81%6.43%0.36%0.29%

Drawdowns

TGFRX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGFRX drawdown since its inception was -95.35%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGFRX and FMDGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TGFRXFMDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.35%

-38.59%

-56.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.01%

-14.75%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.35%

-38.59%

-56.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.38%

-11.68%

-80.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.67%

-11.34%

-20.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

4.70%

+2.54%

Volatility

TGFRX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison

Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a higher volatility of 12.37% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 6.94%. This indicates that TGFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TGFRXFMDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.37%

6.94%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.40%

13.16%

+11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.36%

23.17%

+12.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

793.45%

22.41%

+771.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

561.16%

24.50%

+536.66%