PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGCEX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGCEX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Select Equities Fund (TGCEX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGCEX achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.52% return. Over the past 10 years, TGCEX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 15.90%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.49% annualized return.


TGCEX

1D
-0.88%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
2.00%
6M
5.17%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
15.90%

RYGRX

1D
-2.22%
1M
9.58%
YTD
30.52%
6M
32.31%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGCEX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGCEX
TCW Select Equities Fund
2.00%10.77%30.65%44.34%-36.51%25.84%39.32%36.03%2.42%32.85%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
30.52%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TGCEX and RYGRX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.89

The correlation between TGCEX and RYGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGCEX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGCEX
TGCEX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TGCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TGCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGCEX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Select Equities Fund (TGCEX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGCEXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

3.41

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

12.74

-11.59

TGCEX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGCEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGCEX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGCEX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGCEX drawdown since its inception was -63.61%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGCEX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGCEXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.61%

-54.22%

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.31%

-11.17%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.62%

-24.95%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.96%

-36.57%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.96%

-36.63%

-6.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-2.22%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-9.40%

-7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.32%

2.99%

+4.33%

Volatility

TGCEX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Select Equities Fund (TGCEX) is 6.34%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that TGCEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGCEXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

9.96%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

18.30%

-4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.12%

21.43%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.21%

23.80%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.60%

23.03%

-0.43%

TGCEX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGCEX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGCEX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

TGCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.34%, more than RYGRX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.90%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%
TGCEX
TCW Select Equities Fund
12.34%12.58%15.71%12.24%20.14%12.87%7.11%9.06%16.70%26.37%6.68%7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGCEX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to TGCEX (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGCEX dropped -63.61% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGCEX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer