TFPN vs. WEEL
TFPN (Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF) and WEEL (Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFPN is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Tidal, while WEEL is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tidal. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TFPN returned 29.78% vs 16.25% for WEEL. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TFPN charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WEEL.
Performance
TFPN vs. WEEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFPN achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than WEEL's 6.19% return.
TFPN
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.62%
WEEL
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 16.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $429.91K | $568.98K | $358.90K | |
| $406.88K | $319.91K | $357.06K |
TFPN vs. WEEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 16.44% | 3.61% | -2.74% |
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF | 6.19% | 17.73% | 3.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFPN and WEEL is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFPN vs. WEEL — Risk / Return Rank
TFPN
WEEL
TFPN vs. WEEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFPN | WEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 3.32 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 15.04 | -6.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFPN vs. WEEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, roughly equal to the maximum WEEL drawdown of -17.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and WEEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFPN | WEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -17.45% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -4.60% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -0.40% | -8.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -1.41% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 1.02% | +2.23% |
Volatility
TFPN vs. WEEL - Volatility Comparison
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) at 2.91%. This indicates that TFPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFPN | WEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 2.91% | +4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 6.93% | +6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 8.59% | +7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 12.65% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 12.65% | +0.70% |
TFPN vs. WEEL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEL's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFPN vs. WEEL - Dividend Comparison
TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WEEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.98% |
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF | 12.72% | 12.72% | 6.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFPN and WEEL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TFPN has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to WEEL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPN dropped -16.72% vs WEEL's -17.45%.
On 1-year performance, TFPN leads with 29.78% vs 16.25% for WEEL. On fees, WEEL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, WEEL has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TFPN has performed better with a 29.78% return vs 16.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WEEL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for TFPN.
WEEL has the higher dividend yield at 12.72%, compared with 0.00% for TFPN.
TFPN is categorized as Global Allocation, while WEEL is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for TFPN and 0.99% for WEEL.
WEEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFPN and WEEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer