PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFPN vs. FARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFPN vs. FARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPN achieves a 27.01% return, which is significantly higher than FARX's 9.60% return.


TFPN

1D
0.91%
1M
5.79%
YTD
27.01%
6M
28.49%
1Y
45.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FARX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.27%
YTD
9.60%
6M
10.73%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFPN vs. FARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
27.01%3.61%-1.38%
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
9.60%10.61%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TFPN and FARX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.45

The correlation between TFPN and FARX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFPN vs. FARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFPN
TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FARX
FARX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFPN vs. FARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFPNFARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.58

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.19

7.19

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.51

24.70

-3.20

TFPN vs. FARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFPN Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is comparable to the FARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFPN and FARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFPNFARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37

2.89

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

2.12

-1.29

Drawdowns

TFPN vs. FARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, which is greater than FARX's maximum drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and FARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFPNFARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.72%

-5.83%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-2.80%

-4.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-1.02%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

0.81%

+1.33%

Volatility

TFPN vs. FARX - Volatility Comparison

Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) at 1.42%. This indicates that TFPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFPNFARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

1.42%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

5.49%

+6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

6.96%

+6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.53%

6.94%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.53%

6.94%

+5.59%

TFPN vs. FARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FARX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFPN vs. FARX - Dividend Comparison

TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
2.89%3.25%0.19%0.00%
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
0.00%0.00%0.94%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFPN and FARX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFPN has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to FARX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPN dropped -16.72% vs FARX's -5.83%.

On 1-year performance, TFPN leads with 45.99% vs 20.01% for FARX. On fees, FARX is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, FARX has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TFPN has performed better with a 45.99% return vs 20.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FARX is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for TFPN.

FARX has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for TFPN.

TFPN is categorized as Global Allocation, while FARX is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for TFPN and 1.00% for FARX.

TFPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFPN and FARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer