TFPN vs. ENDW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW).

TFPN and ENDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TFPN is an actively managed fund by Tidal ETFs. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023. ENDW is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Apr 9, 2025.

Performance

TFPN vs. ENDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TFPN vs. ENDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	8.26%	17.68%
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	3.42%	30.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPN achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than ENDW's 3.42% return.

TFPN

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -5.66%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 12.04%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENDW

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: 3.42%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFPN vs. ENDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ENDW's 0.29% expense ratio.

TFPN

Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF

ENDW

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

Return for Risk

TFPN vs. ENDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFPN

TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 86
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFPN vs. ENDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TFPN	ENDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFPN	ENDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	3.24	-2.86

Correlation

The correlation between TFPN and ENDW is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TFPN vs. ENDW - Dividend Comparison

TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	0.98%
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	2.34%	1.91%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TFPN vs. ENDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, which is greater than ENDW's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and ENDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFPN	ENDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.72%	-6.44%	-10.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.21%	-4.36%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-0.82%	-4.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TFPN	ENDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.40%	11.36%	+2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.38%	11.36%	+1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.38%	11.36%	+1.02%