TFNS vs. IYG
TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) and IYG (iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. TFNS is actively managed, while IYG is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TFNS charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYG.
Performance
TFNS vs. IYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -3.01% return, which is significantly higher than IYG's -3.88% return.
TFNS
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- -3.01%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYG
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
TFNS vs. IYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | -3.01% | 10.41% |
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | -3.88% | 12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFNS and IYG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.97 |
TFNS vs. IYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TFNS
IYG
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TFNS
IYG
Technology
TFNS
IYG
-
Industrials
TFNS
IYG
-
Basic Materials
TFNS
-
IYG
-
Communication Services
TFNS
-
IYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
TFNS
-
IYG
-
Consumer Defensive
TFNS
-
IYG
-
Energy
TFNS
-
IYG
-
Healthcare
TFNS
-
IYG
-
Real Estate
TFNS
-
IYG
-
Utilities
TFNS
-
IYG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFNS vs. IYG — Risk / Return Rank
TFNS
IYG
TFNS vs. IYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFNS | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.22 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
TFNS vs. IYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum IYG drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and IYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFNS | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -81.84% | +67.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.72% | -7.23% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -20.74% | +16.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.11% | — |
Volatility
TFNS vs. IYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFNS | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 15.65% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 20.47% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 23.54% | -8.32% |
TFNS vs. IYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than IYG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFNS vs. IYG - Dividend Comparison
TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than IYG's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | 1.11% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 1.25% | 1.71% | 1.59% | 1.81% | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.33% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | 0.51% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, TFNS and IYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IYG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IYG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.
IYG has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.51% for TFNS.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 0.42% for IYG.
Find the right allocation for TFNS and IYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer