TFNS vs. BPAY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) and BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TFNS charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BPAY.

Performance

TFNS vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -12.44% return.

TFNS

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: -5.36%
• 6M: -2.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPAY

• 1D: -4.23%
• 1M: -4.47%
• YTD: -12.44%
• 6M: -14.32%
• 1Y: -10.80%
• 3Y*: 8.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFNS vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	-5.36%	10.41%
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	-12.44%	-2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TFNS and BPAY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.69

TFNS vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TFNS	BPAY
Financial Services	97.1%	53.0%
Technology	1.9%	36.4%
Industrials	0.9%	4.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	2.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TFNS vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY

BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFNS vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFNS	BPAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.06	+0.25

Drawdowns

TFNS vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum BPAY drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and BPAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFNS	BPAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.00%	-33.62%	+19.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-33.62%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.00%	-26.03%	+18.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-10.54%	+6.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TFNS	BPAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.04%	26.01%	-10.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.04%	24.35%	-9.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.04%	24.35%	-9.31%

TFNS vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFNS vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison

TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than BPAY's 7.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	7.41%	6.49%	0.48%	1.18%	0.18%
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	0.52%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFNS and BPAY in my portfolio?

TFNS and BPAY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TFNS or BPAY?

On fees, TFNS is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFNS or BPAY?

TFNS is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFNS or BPAY?

BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.52% for TFNS.

What is the main difference between TFNS and BPAY?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 0.70% for BPAY.