TFLR vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TFLR (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFLR is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TFLR returned 4.71% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. TFLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

TFLR vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLR achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.13% return.

TFLR

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.45%
• 6M: 1.20%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 18.08%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 120.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFLR vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	1.62%	5.86%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.13%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TFLR and WNTR is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.25

Return for Risk

TFLR vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFLR

TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 80
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 68

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFLR vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TFLR	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.26	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	2.47	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.34	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	2.84	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.88	7.31	+2.57

TFLR vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLR and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TFLR vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLR drawdown since its inception was -4.01%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLR and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFLR	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-42.65%	+38.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.18%	-42.65%	+40.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-10.15%	+10.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-20.53%	+20.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	16.58%	-16.10%

Volatility

TFLR vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) is 0.41%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that TFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFLR	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.41%	18.84%	-18.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.75%	47.46%	-45.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00%	53.83%	-51.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	53.56%	-49.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.63%	53.56%	-49.93%

TFLR vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFLR vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

TFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	6.71%	6.93%	8.18%	7.76%	0.58%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.14%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFLR and WNTR in my portfolio?

TFLR and WNTR have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFLR or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to TFLR (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLR dropped -4.01% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, TFLR or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 4.71% for TFLR. On fees, TFLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TFLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TFLR or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFLR or WNTR?

TFLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFLR or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 6.71% for TFLR.

What is the main difference between TFLR and WNTR?

TFLR is categorized as Bank Loan, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TFLR and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.