PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFLR vs. TCAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFLR vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLR achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than TCAF's 6.51% return.


TFLR

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.39%
6M
2.07%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
10Y*

TCAF

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.54%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.60%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFLR vs. TCAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
1.39%6.57%8.77%6.63%
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
6.51%15.45%20.93%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TFLR and TCAF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFLR vs. TCAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFLR
TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFLR vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFLRTCAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.33

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.82

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

7.28

+4.84

TFLR vs. TCAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the TCAF Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLR and TCAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFLRTCAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

1.80

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.18

1.26

+0.92

Drawdowns

TFLR vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLR drawdown since its inception was -4.01%, smaller than the maximum TCAF drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLR and TCAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFLRTCAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-16.37%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-11.33%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.97%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-2.06%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

2.82%

-2.35%

Volatility

TFLR vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) is 0.41%, while T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that TFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFLRTCAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

2.43%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

8.75%

-7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

11.47%

-9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.68%

13.94%

-10.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.68%

13.94%

-10.26%

TFLR vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFLR vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison

TFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than TCAF's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.47%0.50%0.43%0.26%0.00%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
6.77%6.93%8.18%7.76%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFLR and TCAF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCAF has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to TFLR (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLR dropped -4.01% vs TCAF's -16.37%.

On 1-year performance, TCAF leads with 20.51% vs 5.72% for TFLR. On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, TFLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TCAF has performed better with a 20.51% return vs 5.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.

TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 0.47% for TCAF.

TFLR is categorized as Bank Loan, while TCAF is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TFLR and 0.31% for TCAF.

TFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFLR and TCAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer