TFLO vs. WRLD
TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index, while WRLD (World Acceptance Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TFLO returned 2.36%/yr vs 14.75%/yr for WRLD. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TFLO vs. WRLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFLO achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD's 19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TFLO has underperformed WRLD with an annualized return of 2.36%, while WRLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.75% annualized return.
TFLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
WRLD
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 12.21%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
TFLO vs. WRLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.61% | 4.22% | 5.34% | 5.12% | 1.99% | -0.02% | 0.43% | 2.04% | 1.76% | 1.01% |
WRLD World Acceptance Corporation | 19.17% | 24.86% | -13.86% | 97.95% | -73.13% | 140.10% | 18.31% | -15.51% | 26.68% | 25.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFLO and WRLD is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFLO vs. WRLD — Risk / Return Rank
TFLO
WRLD
TFLO vs. WRLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFLO | WRLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +13.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +50.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 13.94 | 1.07 | +12.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 201.22 | 0.18 | +201.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 823.26 | 0.36 | +822.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFLO | WRLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.09 | 0.14 | +13.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 10.30 | 0.03 | +10.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 5.19 | 0.27 | +4.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.25 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
TFLO vs. WRLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFLO drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum WRLD drawdown of -77.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLO and WRLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFLO | WRLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -77.65% | +72.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -37.34% | +37.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.04% | -39.37% | +39.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.13% | -77.00% | +76.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.16% | -77.00% | +76.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -35.41% | +35.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -33.22% | +33.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 18.92% | -18.92% |
Volatility
TFLO vs. WRLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) is 0.07%, while World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that TFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFLO | WRLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.07% | 6.81% | -6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.20% | 37.13% | -36.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28% | 48.82% | -48.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.35% | 55.09% | -54.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.46% | 55.18% | -54.72% |
Dividends
TFLO vs. WRLD - Dividend Comparison
TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while WRLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.90% | 4.16% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.31% | 0.15% |
WRLD World Acceptance Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFLO and WRLD have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WRLD has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLO dropped -5.01% vs WRLD's -77.65%.
TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.09 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFLO and WRLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer