PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFLO vs. SUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFLO vs. SUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLO achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly higher than SUB's 0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TFLO has outperformed SUB with an annualized return of 2.41%, while SUB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.42% annualized return.


TFLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
6M
1.88%
YTD
2.22%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
2.41%
ALL TIME*
1.96%

SUB

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.08%
6M
0.19%
YTD
0.76%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
1.42%
ALL TIME*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$44.46M$43.86M$47.41M
$79.31M$72.74M$75.47M

TFLO vs. SUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.22%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%2.04%1.76%1.01%
SUB
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
0.76%3.64%2.17%2.91%-2.05%0.03%2.51%2.93%1.85%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TFLO and SUB is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFLO vs. SUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SUB
SUB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TFLO vs. SUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFLOSUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+11.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+44.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

12.34

1.37

+10.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

199.41

2.50

+196.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

766.49

6.88

+759.61

TFLO vs. SUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLO Sharpe Ratio is 13.73, which is higher than the SUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLO and SUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFLO vs. SUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLO drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum SUB drawdown of -9.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLO and SUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFLOSUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-9.46%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.81%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.04%

-1.23%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

-4.33%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.16%

-9.46%

+9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.91%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.29%

-0.28%

Volatility

TFLO vs. SUB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) is 0.08%, while iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) has a volatility of 0.51%. This indicates that TFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFLOSUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

0.51%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.19%

0.90%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29%

1.12%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.35%

1.65%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.45%

2.60%

-2.15%

TFLO vs. SUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TFLO vs. SUB - Dividend Comparison

TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than SUB's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SUB
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
2.54%2.42%2.10%1.73%0.86%0.72%1.23%1.58%1.32%0.95%0.75%0.77%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.83%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFLO and SUB have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUB has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to TFLO (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLO dropped -5.01% vs SUB's -9.46%.

On 10-year performance, TFLO leads with 2.41% vs 1.42% for SUB. On fees, SUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TFLO has performed better with a 2.41% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TFLO.

TFLO has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.54% for SUB.

TFLO is categorized as Government Bonds, while SUB is Municipal Bonds. TFLO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index, while SUB tracks ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TFLO and 0.07% for SUB.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.73 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFLO and SUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer