TFLO vs. CGSD
TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) and CGSD (Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFLO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index, while CGSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group. TFLO is passively managed, while CGSD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TFLO returned 4.68%/yr vs 5.25%/yr for CGSD. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TFLO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CGSD.
Performance
TFLO vs. CGSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFLO achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than CGSD's 0.88% return.
TFLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
CGSD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFLO vs. CGSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 2.04% | 4.22% | 5.34% | 5.12% | 0.75% |
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 0.88% | 6.11% | 5.46% | 5.03% | 1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFLO and CGSD is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.01 |
The correlation between TFLO and CGSD shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFLO vs. CGSD — Risk / Return Rank
TFLO
CGSD
TFLO vs. CGSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFLO | CGSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +43.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 12.34 | 1.52 | +10.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 199.41 | 3.35 | +196.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 766.50 | 15.81 | +750.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFLO vs. CGSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFLO drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, which is greater than CGSD's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLO and CGSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFLO | CGSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -1.75% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -1.11% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.04% | -1.11% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.21% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -0.28% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.24% | -0.23% |
Volatility
TFLO vs. CGSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) is 0.11%, while Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) has a volatility of 0.44%. This indicates that TFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFLO | CGSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.11% | 0.44% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.21% | 1.09% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29% | 1.45% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.36% | 2.15% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.45% | 2.15% | -1.70% |
TFLO vs. CGSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CGSD's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TFLO vs. CGSD - Dividend Comparison
TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than CGSD's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 4.47% | 4.48% | 4.57% | 4.43% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.84% | 4.16% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFLO and CGSD have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGSD has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to TFLO (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLO dropped -5.01% vs CGSD's -1.75%.
On 3-year performance, CGSD leads with 5.25% vs 4.68% for TFLO. On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGSD has performed better with a 5.25% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CGSD.
CGSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 3.84% for TFLO.
TFLO is categorized as Government Bonds, while CGSD is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TFLO and 0.25% for CGSD.
TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.67 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFLO and CGSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer