TFJL vs. NVDO
TFJL (Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TFJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
TFJL vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFJL achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
TFJL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -4.14%
- 1Y
- -2.72%
- 3Y*
- -1.72%
- 5Y*
- -3.76%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFJL vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -2.35% | -0.88% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFJL and NVDO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFJL vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
TFJL
NVDO
TFJL vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFJL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFJL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 1.30 | -1.78 |
Drawdowns
TFJL vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFJL drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFJL and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFJL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.45% | -16.25% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.83% | -2.68% | -20.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.02% | -4.99% | -10.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | — | — |
Volatility
TFJL vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFJL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 31.93% | -23.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.34% | 31.93% | -22.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 31.93% | -22.90% |
TFJL vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFJL vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
TFJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFJL and NVDO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TFJL.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for TFJL.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TFJL and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for TFJL and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer