TFI vs. RVNU
TFI (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - TFI tracks the Bloomberg US Municipal Managed Money (1-25 Y) while RVNU tracks the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TFI returned 1.28%/yr vs 1.66%/yr for RVNU. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TFI charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.
Performance
TFI vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFI achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, TFI has underperformed RVNU with an annualized return of 1.28%, while RVNU has yielded a comparatively higher 1.66% annualized return.
TFI
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.96%
RVNU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 7.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $989.54K | $624.16K | $652.11K | |
| $30.53M | $23.31M | $20.62M |
TFI vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFI SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF | 0.12% | 3.62% | -0.01% | 5.62% | -10.17% | 0.25% | 5.82% | 7.41% | 0.52% | 5.50% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 2.42% | 0.58% | 1.46% | 11.19% | -16.60% | 2.28% | 6.54% | 10.16% | -0.56% | 8.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFI and RVNU is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between TFI and RVNU shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFI vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank
TFI
RVNU
TFI vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFI | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.92 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 9.49 | -5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFI vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFI drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFI and RVNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFI | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.49% | -23.51% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -2.64% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.65% | -9.81% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.26% | -23.11% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.49% | -23.51% | +8.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -4.02% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -4.95% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.81% | +0.12% |
Volatility
TFI vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) is 0.87%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that TFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFI | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 1.48% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 3.70% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80% | 4.98% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.32% | 7.22% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.99% | 7.25% | -2.26% |
TFI vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFI has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TFI vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison
TFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than RVNU's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.63% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
TFI SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF | 3.58% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.41% | 1.87% | 1.71% | 1.91% | 2.14% | 2.26% | 2.16% | 2.39% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFI and RVNU have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVNU has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to TFI (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFI dropped -15.49% vs RVNU's -23.51%.
On 10-year performance, RVNU leads with 1.66% vs 1.28% for TFI. On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RVNU has performed better with a 1.66% return vs 1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for TFI.
RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 3.58% for TFI.
TFI tracks Bloomberg US Municipal Managed Money (1-25 Y), while RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for TFI and 0.15% for RVNU.
RVNU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFI and RVNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer