PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFI vs. ACTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFI vs. ACTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) and Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFI achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than ACTHX's 2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, TFI has underperformed ACTHX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while ACTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.79% annualized return.


TFI

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.63%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.64%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
1.51%

ACTHX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.93%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFI vs. ACTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFI
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF
1.19%3.62%-0.01%5.62%-10.17%0.25%5.82%7.41%0.52%5.50%
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
2.64%4.38%5.54%4.34%-13.94%6.29%3.25%10.12%1.44%9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TFI and ACTHX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2007

0.54

The correlation between TFI and ACTHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFI vs. ACTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFI
TFI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ACTHX
ACTHX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ACTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ACTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFI vs. ACTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) and Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFIACTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.48

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.58

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

8.38

-0.48

TFI vs. ACTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFI Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the ACTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFI and ACTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFIACTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.03

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.12

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.52

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.10

-0.59

Drawdowns

TFI vs. ACTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFI drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum ACTHX drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFI and ACTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFIACTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-27.29%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-2.98%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.81%

-10.13%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-19.83%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.49%

-19.83%

+4.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

0.00%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-3.55%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.92%

-0.07%

Volatility

TFI vs. ACTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) is 0.90%, while Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that TFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFIACTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

1.40%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

2.73%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

3.83%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

5.72%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

5.39%

-0.39%

TFI vs. ACTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFI has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than ACTHX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFI vs. ACTHX - Dividend Comparison

TFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than ACTHX's 5.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
5.34%7.14%5.64%4.22%4.72%3.95%4.33%4.70%4.78%4.71%5.11%4.93%
TFI
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF
3.48%3.32%3.01%2.41%1.87%1.71%1.91%2.14%2.26%2.16%2.39%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFI and ACTHX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACTHX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to TFI (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFI dropped -15.49% vs ACTHX's -27.29%.

TFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFI and ACTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer