PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFI vs. IVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFI vs. IVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFI achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 14.36% return.


TFI

1D
0.22%
1M
1.45%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.48%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
2.74%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.39%

IVES

1D
-1.36%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
14.36%
6M
11.68%
1Y
35.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFI vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TFI and IVES is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFI vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFI
TFI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFI Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IVES
IVES Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFI vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFIIVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.23

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.58

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

4.30

+3.06

TFI vs. IVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFI Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the IVES Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFI and IVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFI vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFI drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFI and IVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFIIVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-22.64%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-22.64%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-13.37%

+12.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-5.86%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

8.32%

-7.46%

Volatility

TFI vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) is 0.76%, while Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that TFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFIIVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

11.81%

-11.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

21.22%

-19.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78%

27.13%

-24.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

26.65%

-22.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

26.65%

-21.66%

TFI vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFI has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFI vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison

TFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than IVES's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
0.36%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TFI
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF
3.47%3.32%3.01%2.41%1.87%1.71%1.91%2.14%2.26%2.16%2.39%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFI and IVES have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVES has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to TFI (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFI dropped -15.49% vs IVES's -22.64%.

On 1-year performance, IVES leads with 35.69% vs 6.35% for TFI. On fees, TFI is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, TFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVES has performed better with a 35.69% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TFI is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

TFI has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.36% for IVES.

TFI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IVES is Technology Equities. TFI tracks Bloomberg US Municipal Managed Money (1-25 Y), while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for TFI and 0.75% for IVES.

TFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFI and IVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer