TFCGX vs. UMBHX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TFCGX (Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TFCGX charges 1.45%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.

Performance

TFCGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TFCGX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 2.26%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 14.88%
• 1Y: 28.31%
• 3Y*: 13.86%
• 5Y*: -1.67%
• 10Y*: —

UMBHX

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFCGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TFCGX Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund	5.55%
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TFCGX and UMBHX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.74

Return for Risk

TFCGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFCGX

TFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
TFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

UMBHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFCGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TFCGX	UMBHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.97	—	—

Drawdowns

TFCGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFCGX drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -6.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFCGX and UMBHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFCGX	UMBHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.73%	-6.07%	-91.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.93%	-4.84%	-91.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.13%	-2.01%	-30.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TFCGX	UMBHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.09%	31.18%	-4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,319.21%	31.18%	+1,288.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	956.06%	31.18%	+924.88%

TFCGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFCGX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFCGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TFCGX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TFCGX Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	10.28%	5.09%	1.71%	1.88%
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFCGX and UMBHX in my portfolio?

TFCGX and UMBHX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.