TFCGX vs. RFIMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX).

TFCGX is managed by Taylor Frigon Capital Management. It was launched on Dec 27, 2016. RFIMX is managed by Ranger Funds. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.

Performance

TFCGX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TFCGX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TFCGX Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund	-15.30%	9.60%	20.36%	20.16%	-48.26%	10.57%	79.36%	32.17%	-1.78%
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund	0.96%	1.99%	11.52%	9.14%	-24.26%	30.58%	44.44%	24.94%	-0.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFCGX achieves a -15.30% return, which is significantly lower than RFIMX's 0.96% return.

TFCGX

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: -8.65%
• YTD: -15.30%
• 6M: -13.99%
• 1Y: 13.81%
• 3Y*: 7.95%
• 5Y*: -6.70%
• 10Y*: —

RFIMX

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -6.11%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 16.08%
• 3Y*: 5.52%
• 5Y*: 1.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFCGX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFCGX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.

RFIMX

Ranger Micro Cap Fund

TFCGX

Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund

Return for Risk

TFCGX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFCGX

TFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 16
TFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
TFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

RFIMX

RFIMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
RFIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
RFIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RFIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
RFIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
RFIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFCGX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TFCGX	RFIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.71	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	1.15	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.14	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	1.05	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.57	3.64	-2.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TFCGX vs. RFIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the RFIMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFCGX and RFIMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFCGX	RFIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	0.71	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.00	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.00	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between TFCGX and RFIMX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TFCGX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison

TFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TFCGX Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	10.28%	5.09%	1.71%	1.88%
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund	1.31%	1.33%	0.00%	0.77%	47.82%	71.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.36%

Drawdowns

TFCGX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFCGX drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, roughly equal to the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFCGX and RFIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFCGX	RFIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.73%	-99.41%	+1.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.42%	-11.77%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.73%	-99.41%	+1.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.00%	-99.24%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.21%	-27.70%	-2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.21%	3.41%	+2.80%

Volatility

TFCGX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison

Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) at 6.22%. This indicates that TFCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFCGX	RFIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.36%	6.22%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.19%	13.61%	+5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.91%	22.27%	+9.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,319.21%	8,947.93%	-7,628.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	970.55%	7,425.82%	-6,455.27%