PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEXN vs. PSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEXN vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEXN achieves a 25.94% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.


TEXN

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.35%
YTD
25.94%
6M
24.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSCX

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.00%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.98%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEXN vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TEXN and PSCX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.49

TEXN vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEXN
PSCX

Energy

36.1%
4.2%

Industrials

16.9%
8.4%

Technology

15.5%
33.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.0%

Real Estate

4.2%
2.0%

Financial Services

4.1%
12.5%

Communication Services

3.6%
10.3%

Utilities

2.9%
2.6%

Healthcare

2.9%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.9%

Energy

TEXN
36.1%
PSCX
4.2%

Industrials

TEXN
16.9%
PSCX
8.4%

Technology

TEXN
15.5%
PSCX
33.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TEXN
10.8%
PSCX
10.0%

Real Estate

TEXN
4.2%
PSCX
2.0%

Financial Services

TEXN
4.1%
PSCX
12.5%

Communication Services

TEXN
3.6%
PSCX
10.3%

Utilities

TEXN
2.9%
PSCX
2.6%

Healthcare

TEXN
2.9%
PSCX
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

TEXN
2.1%
PSCX
5.4%

Basic Materials

TEXN
0.8%
PSCX
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEXN vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEXN

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEXN vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TEXN vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEXNPSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.75

1.27

+1.47

Drawdowns

TEXN vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and PSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEXNPSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-10.20%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.12%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-1.87%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

Volatility

TEXN vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEXNPSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

5.53%

+8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

7.07%

+7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.19%

6.96%

+7.23%

TEXN vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEXN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEXN vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TEXN and PSCX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TEXN and 0.75% for PSCX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEXN and PSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer