PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEXN vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEXN vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEXN achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 32.00% return.


TEXN

1D
-1.33%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
20.05%
6M
18.60%
1Y
30.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
-4.48%
1M
8.74%
YTD
32.00%
6M
29.92%
1Y
41.78%
3Y*
33.87%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
17.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEXN vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
20.05%8.33%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
32.00%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TEXN and MTUM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.56

TEXN vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEXN
MTUM

Energy

32.3%
10.5%

Technology

20.6%
50.2%

Industrials

16.3%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
2.9%

Real Estate

3.9%
1.3%

Financial Services

3.9%
5.0%

Communication Services

3.3%
5.1%

Utilities

2.7%
0.6%

Healthcare

2.7%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.7%
2.3%

Energy

TEXN
32.3%
MTUM
10.5%

Technology

TEXN
20.6%
MTUM
50.2%

Industrials

TEXN
16.3%
MTUM
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TEXN
11.6%
MTUM
2.9%

Real Estate

TEXN
3.9%
MTUM
1.3%

Financial Services

TEXN
3.9%
MTUM
5.0%

Communication Services

TEXN
3.3%
MTUM
5.1%

Utilities

TEXN
2.7%
MTUM
0.6%

Healthcare

TEXN
2.7%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

TEXN
2.1%
MTUM
3.7%

Basic Materials

TEXN
0.7%
MTUM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEXN vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEXN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEXN vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEXNMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

TEXN vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEXN vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEXNMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-34.08%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-11.54%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-4.48%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-6.19%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

Volatility

TEXN vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEXNMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

21.93%

-7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

21.15%

-6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

21.31%

-6.81%

TEXN vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEXN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TEXN vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than MTUM's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
1.40%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEXN and MTUM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, MTUM leads with 41.78% vs 30.05% for TEXN. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 41.78% return vs 30.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TEXN.

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

TEXN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TEXN and 0.15% for MTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEXN and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer