TETH vs. BTRN
TETH (21Shares Ethereum ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. TETH is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, TETH returned -46.49% vs -23.90% for BTRN. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TETH vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TETH achieves a -35.88% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.44% return.
TETH
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 11.40%
- 6M
- -42.16%
- YTD
- -35.88%
- 1Y
- -46.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.89%
BTRN
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- -11.62%
- YTD
- -9.44%
- 1Y
- -23.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.83%
TETH vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TETH 21Shares Ethereum ETF | -35.88% | -11.20% | -5.86% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.44% | 4.89% | 23.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between TETH and BTRN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between TETH and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TETH vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
TETH
BTRN
TETH vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum ETF (TETH) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TETH | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.74 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.92 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -1.43 | +0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TETH vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TETH drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TETH and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TETH | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -36.97% | -30.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.74% | -26.03% | -41.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.64% | -25.42% | -35.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.85% | -15.00% | -19.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.79% | 16.77% | +27.02% |
Volatility
TETH vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Ethereum ETF (TETH) has a higher volatility of 14.30% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 2.25%. This indicates that TETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TETH | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.30% | 2.25% | +12.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.10% | 9.99% | +37.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.54% | 17.16% | +50.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.67% | 30.16% | +41.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.67% | 30.16% | +41.51% |
Dividends
TETH vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
TETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than BTRN's 31.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 31.00% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
TETH 21Shares Ethereum ETF | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TETH and BTRN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TETH has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to BTRN (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TETH dropped -67.74% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -23.90% vs -46.49% for TETH. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -23.90% return vs -46.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.00%, compared with 0.34% for TETH.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Global X.
TETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TETH and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer