TEST vs. IPDP
TEST (YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. TEST charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
TEST vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TEST
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -8.43%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEST vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TEST YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | -2.34% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEST vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (TEST) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEST | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | — | — |
Drawdowns
TEST vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEST drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEST and IPDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEST | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.35% | 0.00% | -23.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.44% | 0.00% | -14.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | 0.00% | -10.39% |
Volatility
TEST vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEST | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.46% | 0.00% | +32.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 0.00% | +32.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 0.00% | +32.46% |
TEST vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEST has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEST vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
TEST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.42%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEST YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 14.42% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TEST is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEST is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
TEST has the higher dividend yield at 14.42%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TEST and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for TEST and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer