PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEST vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEST vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (TEST) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEST achieves a -10.90% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 7.39% return.


TEST

1D
-0.24%
1M
-9.29%
YTD
-10.90%
6M
-16.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
-0.59%
1M
-12.81%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.47%
1Y
81.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEST vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TEST and GOOP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEST vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEST

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEST vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (TEST) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TESTGOOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

TEST vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEST vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEST drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEST and GOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TESTGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.35%

-27.49%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.74%

-15.80%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.56%

-6.40%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

Volatility

TEST vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TESTGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.30%

28.90%

+4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.30%

26.14%

+7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.30%

26.14%

+7.16%

TEST vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEST has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEST vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

TEST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.58%, more than GOOP's 13.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
13.21%11.79%13.73%2.06%
TEST
YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF
16.58%2.50%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEST and GOOP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GOOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TEST.

TEST has the higher dividend yield at 16.58%, compared with 13.21% for GOOP.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TEST and 0.99% for GOOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEST and GOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer