PortfoliosLab logo
PLAB vs. ASMIY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PLAB and ASMIY is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PLAB vs. ASMIY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) and ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLAB:

-0.84

ASMIY:

-0.47

Sortino Ratio

PLAB:

-1.11

ASMIY:

-0.44

Omega Ratio

PLAB:

0.86

ASMIY:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

PLAB:

-0.62

ASMIY:

-0.48

Martin Ratio

PLAB:

-1.96

ASMIY:

-0.89

Ulcer Index

PLAB:

19.76%

ASMIY:

28.37%

Daily Std Dev

PLAB:

46.08%

ASMIY:

49.64%

Max Drawdown

PLAB:

-99.22%

ASMIY:

-98.37%

Current Drawdown

PLAB:

-62.97%

ASMIY:

-32.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLAB:

$1.06B

ASMIY:

$27.41B

EPS

PLAB:

$1.93

ASMIY:

$10.99

PE Ratio

PLAB:

8.66

ASMIY:

49.51

PEG Ratio

PLAB:

4.27

ASMIY:

1.72

PS Ratio

PLAB:

1.24

ASMIY:

8.75

PB Ratio

PLAB:

1.01

ASMIY:

6.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLAB:

$645.75M

ASMIY:

$3.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLAB:

$232.98M

ASMIY:

$1.59B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLAB achieves a -29.07% return, which is significantly lower than ASMIY's -4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PLAB has underperformed ASMIY with an annualized return of 5.31%, while ASMIY has yielded a comparatively higher 29.63% annualized return.


PLAB

YTD

-29.07%

1M

-9.28%

6M

-32.92%

1Y

-38.90%

3Y*

-8.40%

5Y*

6.86%

10Y*

5.31%

ASMIY

YTD

-4.39%

1M

11.55%

6M

0.79%

1Y

-22.42%

3Y*

20.84%

5Y*

36.92%

10Y*

29.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Photronics, Inc.

ASM International NV ADR

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLAB vs. ASMIY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLAB is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLAB is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLAB is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLAB is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLAB is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLAB is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMIY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASMIY is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASMIY is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASMIY is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASMIY is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASMIY is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASMIY is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLAB vs. ASMIY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) and ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PLAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the ASMIY Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLAB and ASMIY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PLAB vs. ASMIY - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLAB nor ASMIY has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
PLAB
Photronics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ASMIY
ASM International NV ADR
0.00%0.53%0.52%1.08%0.54%1.01%1.98%14.60%1.11%1.78%

Drawdowns

PLAB vs. ASMIY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLAB drawdown since its inception was -99.22%, roughly equal to the maximum ASMIY drawdown of -98.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLAB and ASMIY.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PLAB vs. ASMIY - Volatility Comparison

Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) has a higher volatility of 20.38% compared to ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) at 11.90%. This indicates that PLAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASMIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PLAB vs. ASMIY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Photronics, Inc. and ASM International NV ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
212.14M
839.20M
(PLAB) Total Revenue
(ASMIY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLAB vs. ASMIY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Photronics, Inc. and ASM International NV ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
35.6%
53.4%
(PLAB) Gross Margin
(ASMIY) Gross Margin
PLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Photronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 75.54M and revenue of 212.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.

ASMIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ASM International NV ADR reported a gross profit of 447.80M and revenue of 839.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.4%.

PLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Photronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 52.18M and revenue of 212.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.

ASMIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ASM International NV ADR reported an operating income of 266.20M and revenue of 839.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

PLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Photronics, Inc. reported a net income of 42.85M and revenue of 212.14M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

ASMIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ASM International NV ADR reported a net income of -28.90M and revenue of 839.20M, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.