TEQI vs. VT
TEQI (T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEQI is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. TEQI is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TEQI returned 9.02%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for VT. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEQI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
TEQI vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEQI achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return.
TEQI
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
TEQI vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF | 9.71% | 13.36% | 13.14% | 9.64% | -3.33% | 26.25% | 18.07% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEQI and VT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between TEQI and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TEQI vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TEQI
VT
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
TEQI
VT
Healthcare
TEQI
VT
Industrials
TEQI
VT
Technology
TEQI
VT
Energy
TEQI
VT
Consumer Defensive
TEQI
VT
Utilities
TEQI
VT
Communication Services
TEQI
VT
Consumer Cyclical
TEQI
VT
Real Estate
TEQI
VT
Basic Materials
TEQI
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEQI vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
TEQI
VT
TEQI vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEQI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.04 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 13.53 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEQI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.31 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.69 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.44 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
TEQI vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEQI drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQI and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEQI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.82% | -50.27% | +32.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -9.67% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.85% | -16.51% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -26.38% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -0.88% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -7.02% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.17% | -0.15% |
Volatility
TEQI vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) is 2.68%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that TEQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEQI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 3.83% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 10.17% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 12.70% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 16.05% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 17.23% | -2.11% |
TEQI vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEQI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEQI vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
TEQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF | 1.55% | 1.71% | 1.86% | 2.12% | 2.32% | 3.03% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEQI and VT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to TEQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQI dropped -17.82% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 5-year performance, VT leads with 10.99% vs 9.02% for TEQI. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, TEQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VT has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TEQI.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.55% for TEQI.
TEQI is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TEQI and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEQI and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer