TEO vs. PAM
TEO (Telecom Argentina S.A.) and PAM (Pampa Energía S.A.) are both stocks. TEO operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while PAM operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, TEO returned 1.97%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for PAM. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TEO vs. PAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEO achieves a 20.59% return, which is significantly higher than PAM's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TEO has underperformed PAM with an annualized return of 1.97%, while PAM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.
TEO
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 54.65%
- 3Y*
- 32.97%
- 5Y*
- 26.69%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.34%
PAM
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 19.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.24%
- 5Y*
- 41.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.34M | $12.23M | $17.41M | |
| $3.14M | $3.08M | $6.82M |
TEO vs. PAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEO Telecom Argentina S.A. | 20.59% | -7.40% | 79.33% | 37.87% | 6.86% | -15.34% | -39.38% | -17.25% | -54.46% | 108.17% |
PAM Pampa Energía S.A. | -0.21% | 0.65% | 77.58% | 55.04% | 51.30% | 53.19% | -16.13% | -48.35% | -52.72% | 93.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEO and PAM is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2009 | 0.47 |
The correlation between TEO and PAM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TEO:
$6.03B
PAM:
$4.80B
TEO:
ARS 875.85
PAM:
$8.05
TEO:
23.79
PAM:
10.97
TEO:
0.01
PAM:
0.12
TEO:
0.99
PAM:
2.23
TEO:
1.11
PAM:
1.27
TEO:
ARS 9.04T
PAM:
$2.16B
TEO:
ARS 6.85T
PAM:
$682.00M
TEO:
ARS 3.30T
PAM:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEO vs. PAM — Risk / Return Rank
TEO
PAM
TEO vs. PAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEO | PAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.11 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.51 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 1.23 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEO vs. PAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, which is greater than PAM's maximum drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEO and PAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEO | PAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.60% | -87.41% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.26% | -31.59% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.02% | -40.40% | -13.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.02% | -40.40% | -13.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.58% | -87.41% | +0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.16% | -6.91% | -40.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.78% | -42.23% | -11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.43% | 13.10% | +3.33% |
Volatility
TEO vs. PAM - Volatility Comparison
Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) at 8.56%. This indicates that TEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEO | PAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 8.56% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.26% | 24.74% | +11.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.10% | 49.75% | +16.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.43% | 46.15% | +8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.09% | 51.97% | -1.88% |
Dividends
TEO vs. PAM - Dividend Comparison
TEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while PAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAM Pampa Energía S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEO Telecom Argentina S.A. | 0.35% | 0.42% | 1.91% | 3.43% | 0.00% | 8.90% | 5.27% | 12.36% | 15.08% | 3.33% | 3.57% | 5.28% |
Financials
TEO vs. PAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Telecom Argentina S.A. and Pampa Energía S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TEO vs. PAM - Profitability Comparison
TEO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.80T and revenue of 2.36T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.
PAM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a gross profit of 193.00M and revenue of 573.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.
TEO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported an operating income of 823.75B and revenue of 2.36T, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
PAM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported an operating income of 107.00M and revenue of 573.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
TEO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported a net income of 636.68B and revenue of 2.36T, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.
PAM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a net income of 214.00M and revenue of 573.00M, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TEO and PAM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEO has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to PAM (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEO dropped -98.60% vs PAM's -87.41%.
TEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEO and PAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer