TEMX vs. BPH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TEMX (Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Touchstone, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. Their -0.14 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TEMX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

TEMX vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEMX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -5.54%
• 6M: 12.01%
• YTD: 19.87%
• 1Y: 34.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.92%

BPH

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 16.97%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	$48.44K	$52.11K	$50.96K
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	$2.56K	$10.48K	$16.04K

TEMX vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	0.00%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMX and BPH is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.14

Return for Risk

TEMX vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEMX

TEMX Risk / Return Rank: 49
TEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
TEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEMX vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEMX	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.88	—	—

Drawdowns

TEMX vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMX drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMX and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMX	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-15.58%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.28%	-1.57%	-9.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-5.55%	+2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEMX	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.65%	28.54%	-1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.23%	28.54%	-3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.23%	28.54%	-3.31%

TEMX vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMX vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

TEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than BPH's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.48%	0.00%
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	0.91%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMX and BPH in my portfolio?

TEMX and BPH have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEMX or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMX or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMX or BPH?

TEMX has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.48% for BPH.

What is the main difference between TEMX and BPH?

TEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TEMX and 0.19% for BPH.