TEMX vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TEMX (Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Touchstone, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. TEMX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

TEMX vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEMX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 10.02%
• YTD: 27.65%
• 6M: 29.76%
• 1Y: 43.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMX vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	2.31%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMX and BPH is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	-0.09

Return for Risk

TEMX vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMX

TEMX Risk / Return Rank: 60
TEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMX vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEMX	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEMX	BPH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.83	9.48	-7.65

Drawdowns

TEMX vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMX and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMX	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-2.35%	-12.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	0.00%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-1.08%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEMX	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.87%	25.75%	-3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.76%	25.75%	-2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.76%	25.75%	-2.99%

TEMX vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMX vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

TEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	0.85%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMX and BPH in my portfolio?

TEMX and BPH have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEMX or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMX or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMX or BPH?

TEMX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

What is the main difference between TEMX and BPH?

TEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TEMX and 0.19% for BPH.