TEMWX vs. YFSNX
TEMWX (Templeton World Fund) and YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TEMWX returned 8.92%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for YFSNX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEMWX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for YFSNX.
Performance
TEMWX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMWX achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 20.51% return.
TEMWX
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 13.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.67%
YFSNX
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 20.51%
- 1Y
- 15.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- —
TEMWX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMWX Templeton World Fund | 4.39% | 21.42% | 20.34% | 32.29% | -22.91% | 8.04% | 3.59% | 12.03% | -12.02% | 10.92% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 20.51% | 14.79% | -0.47% | 16.48% | -9.39% | 13.00% | 18.32% | 24.48% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMWX and YFSNX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between TEMWX and YFSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMWX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank
TEMWX
YFSNX
TEMWX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEMWX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 3.56 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEMWX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMWX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than YFSNX's maximum drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMWX and YFSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMWX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -35.14% | -20.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.86% | -14.09% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.70% | -14.29% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -25.26% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -5.95% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -4.94% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 4.71% | -1.16% |
Volatility
TEMWX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) have volatilities of 6.77% and 6.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMWX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 6.56% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 15.64% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.25% | 22.32% | -5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 15.69% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 16.33% | +0.39% |
TEMWX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMWX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMWX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison
TEMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMWX Templeton World Fund | 12.78% | 13.34% | 8.52% | 0.63% | 1.60% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 21.11% | 5.83% | 2.77% | 5.66% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 7.86% | 4.33% | 8.06% | 4.71% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMWX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEMWX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to YFSNX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMWX dropped -55.26% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.
TEMWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEMWX and YFSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer