PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEMUX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEMUX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEMUX achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 28.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMUX has underperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 9.14%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.31% annualized return.


TEMUX

1D
-1.33%
1M
7.04%
YTD
26.66%
6M
29.34%
1Y
53.74%
3Y*
23.38%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
9.14%

FPADX

1D
-0.96%
1M
8.03%
YTD
28.80%
6M
31.68%
1Y
55.65%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMUX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEMUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
26.66%34.68%5.47%9.87%-21.75%-3.50%11.18%22.44%-18.73%39.16%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
28.80%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%18.28%-14.65%35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMUX and FPADX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.95

The correlation between TEMUX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEMUX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMUX
TEMUX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TEMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TEMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMUX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEMUXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.60

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

4.34

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.54

17.23

+1.30

TEMUX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEMUX Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEMUX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEMUXFPADXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76

3.24

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.45

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.37

-0.08

Drawdowns

TEMUX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMUX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMUX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEMUXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.20%

-39.16%

-29.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-13.28%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-16.09%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.67%

-37.00%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.17%

-39.16%

-1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.96%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-13.26%

-8.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.34%

-0.06%

Volatility

TEMUX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) have volatilities of 7.36% and 7.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEMUXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

7.71%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

15.44%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

17.83%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

17.11%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

17.82%

-0.07%

TEMUX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMUX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEMUX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

TEMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than FPADX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
1.83%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%
TEMUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.92%2.43%2.09%2.41%1.92%4.47%1.96%1.81%1.67%1.26%1.10%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEMUX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPADX has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to TEMUX (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMUX dropped -68.20% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

TEMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEMUX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer