TEMT vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TEMT (Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. TEMT is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, TEMT returned -67.39% vs 31.30% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TEMT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

TEMT vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEMT achieves a -42.27% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

TEMT

• 1D: 13.77%
• 1M: 16.30%
• YTD: -42.27%
• 6M: -51.68%
• 1Y: -67.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMT vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF	-42.27%	-49.34%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMT and ISCMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

TEMT vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMT

TEMT Risk / Return Rank: 5
TEMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TEMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TEMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TEMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TEMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 81
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMT vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEMT	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	1.76	-2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	3.18	-3.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	2.31	-1.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	5.53	-6.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	11.76	-12.88

TEMT vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEMT and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEMT vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMT drawdown since its inception was -87.10%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMT and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMT	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.10%	-25.42%	-61.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-87.10%	-5.69%	-81.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.12%	-5.26%	-77.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.48%	-13.34%	-37.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	59.98%	2.67%	+57.31%

Volatility

TEMT vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) has a higher volatility of 50.93% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 5.11%. This indicates that TEMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEMT	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	50.93%	5.11%	+45.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	93.57%	15.45%	+78.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	130.02%	17.84%	+112.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	136.89%	14.28%	+122.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	136.89%	14.28%	+122.61%

TEMT vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMT vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

TEMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.21%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF	58.21%	33.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMT and ISCMF in my portfolio?

TEMT and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEMT or ISCMF?

TEMT has higher volatility (50.93%) compared to ISCMF (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMT dropped -87.10% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, TEMT or ISCMF?

On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 31.30% vs -67.39% for TEMT. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEMT or ISCMF?

Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 31.30% return vs -67.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMT or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for TEMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMT or ISCMF?

TEMT has the higher dividend yield at 58.21%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between TEMT and ISCMF?

TEMT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for TEMT and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.