PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TELNF vs. SEZL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TELNF vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Telenor ASA (TELNF) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TELNF achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 78.32% return.


TELNF

1D
0.00%
1M
2.11%
YTD
12.91%
6M
10.20%
1Y
10.72%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
19.13%

SEZL

1D
-4.42%
1M
31.68%
YTD
78.32%
6M
75.65%
1Y
-0.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TELNF vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TELNF
Telenor ASA
12.91%44.54%0.24%23.71%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
78.32%48.89%1,146.59%-74.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TELNF and SEZL is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023

0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TELNF:

$21.92B

SEZL:

$3.95B

EPS

TELNF:

$10.38

SEZL:

$4.15

PE Ratio

TELNF:

1.54

SEZL:

27.30

PEG Ratio

TELNF:

0.01

SEZL:

0.05

PS Ratio

TELNF:

0.28

SEZL:

8.42

PB Ratio

TELNF:

0.29

SEZL:

20.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

TELNF:

$78.57B

SEZL:

$480.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TELNF:

$54.68B

SEZL:

$426.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

TELNF:

$43.29B

SEZL:

$193.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TELNF vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TELNF
TELNF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TELNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TELNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TELNF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TELNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TELNF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SEZL
SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TELNF vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Telenor ASA (TELNF) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TELNFSEZLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.08

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

-0.01

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

-0.01

+1.11

TELNF vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TELNF Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TELNF and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TELNFSEZLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

-0.01

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.85

-0.56

Drawdowns

TELNF vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TELNF drawdown since its inception was -81.39%, smaller than the maximum SEZL drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TELNF and SEZL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TELNFSEZLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.39%

-89.95%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.81%

-72.02%

+41.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.53%

-37.86%

+25.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.60%

-40.43%

+20.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.80%

53.34%

-43.54%

Volatility

TELNF vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Telenor ASA (TELNF) is 7.53%, while Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a volatility of 21.11%. This indicates that TELNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TELNFSEZLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

21.11%

-13.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.84%

61.86%

-35.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.28%

87.75%

-42.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.85%

135.88%

-103.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.53%

135.88%

-103.35%

Dividends

TELNF vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

TELNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TELNF
Telenor ASA
3.36%6.70%8.07%15.08%19.99%20.90%25.98%24.15%8.98%36.11%26.86%

Financials

TELNF vs. SEZL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Telenor ASA and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
18.20B
135.54M
(TELNF) Total Revenue
(SEZL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TELNF vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Telenor ASA and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
78.0%
86.3%
Portfolio components
TELNF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telenor ASA reported a gross profit of 14.20B and revenue of 18.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.0%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

TELNF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telenor ASA reported an operating income of 4.12B and revenue of 18.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

TELNF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telenor ASA reported a net income of 8.21B and revenue of 18.20B, resulting in a net margin of 45.1%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TELNF and SEZL have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEZL has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to TELNF (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TELNF dropped -81.39% vs SEZL's -89.95%.

TELNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TELNF and SEZL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer