TELNF vs. BCE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Telenor ASA (TELNF) and BCE Inc. (BCE).

Performance

TELNF vs. BCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Telenor ASA (TELNF) and BCE Inc. (BCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TELNF vs. BCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TELNF Telenor ASA	17.47%	44.54%	0.24%	46.35%	-30.70%	12.80%	26.45%	16.56%	-1.84%	135.89%
BCE BCE Inc.	7.90%	10.25%	-35.53%	-4.16%	-10.62%	28.62%	-1.95%	23.38%	-13.02%	16.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TELNF : $23.39B BCE : $23.57B
EPS TELNF : $5.98 BCE : $6.90
PE Ratio TELNF : 2.88 BCE : 3.68
PEG Ratio TELNF : 0.02 BCE : 0.00
PS Ratio TELNF : 0.29 BCE : 0.97
PB Ratio TELNF : 0.33 BCE : 1.20
Total Revenue (TTM) TELNF : $80.08B BCE : $24.46B
Gross Profit (TTM) TELNF : $55.99B BCE : $15.19B
EBITDA (TTM) TELNF : $38.25B BCE : $18.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TELNF achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than BCE's 7.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TELNF has outperformed BCE with an annualized return of 23.37%, while BCE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.18% annualized return.

TELNF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.70%
• YTD: 17.47%
• 6M: 5.91%
• 1Y: 28.18%
• 3Y*: 24.93%
• 5Y*: 13.06%
• 10Y*: 23.37%

BCE

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 10.98%
• 1Y: 17.47%
• 3Y*: -10.81%
• 5Y*: -4.82%
• 10Y*: 0.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TELNF vs. BCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TELNF

TELNF Risk / Return Rank: 64
TELNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
TELNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TELNF Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TELNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TELNF Martin Ratio Rank: 67

BCE

BCE Risk / Return Rank: 65
BCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BCE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TELNF vs. BCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Telenor ASA (TELNF) and BCE Inc. (BCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TELNF	BCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.83	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	1.25	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.16	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	1.35	-0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	3.04	+0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TELNF vs. BCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TELNF Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the BCE Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TELNF and BCE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TELNF	BCE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	0.83	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	-0.26	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.01	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.29	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between TELNF and BCE is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TELNF vs. BCE - Dividend Comparison

TELNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than BCE's 4.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TELNF Telenor ASA	5.70%	6.70%	8.07%	15.08%	19.99%	20.90%	25.98%	24.15%	8.98%	36.11%	26.86%	0.00%
BCE BCE Inc.	4.98%	6.98%	12.47%	7.29%	6.39%	5.37%	5.82%	5.16%	5.84%	4.63%	5.15%	6.00%

Drawdowns

TELNF vs. BCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TELNF drawdown since its inception was -81.39%, smaller than the maximum BCE drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TELNF and BCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TELNF	BCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.39%	-88.66%	+7.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.81%	-12.27%	-18.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.37%	-55.42%	+12.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.37%	-55.42%	+12.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.99%	-42.83%	+33.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.69%	-32.42%	+12.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.11%	5.44%	+3.67%

Volatility

TELNF vs. BCE - Volatility Comparison

Telenor ASA (TELNF) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to BCE Inc. (BCE) at 4.85%. This indicates that TELNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TELNF	BCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	4.85%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.55%	13.16%	+28.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.63%	21.21%	+26.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.74%	18.66%	+14.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.65%	19.11%	+14.54%

Financials

TELNF vs. BCE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Telenor ASA and BCE Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TELNF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Telenor ASA reported a gross profit of 14.99B and revenue of 19.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.5%.

BCE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BCE Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.69B and revenue of 6.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.

TELNF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Telenor ASA reported an operating income of 4.03B and revenue of 19.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

BCE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BCE Inc. reported an operating income of 2.69B and revenue of 6.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.0%.

TELNF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Telenor ASA reported a net income of -761.00M and revenue of 19.84B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.

BCE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BCE Inc. reported a net income of 593.52M and revenue of 6.40B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.