PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEL vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TEL vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEL achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly lower than T's -7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TEL has outperformed T with an annualized return of 14.89%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.


TEL

1D
-3.31%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-9.00%
6M
-11.51%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
14.89%

T

1D
-1.10%
1M
-10.57%
YTD
-7.40%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
-16.38%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEL vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
-9.00%61.60%3.51%24.62%-27.66%35.12%28.95%29.37%-18.87%39.88%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.40%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TEL and T is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.33

The correlation between TEL and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TEL:

$9.78

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

TEL:

21.01

T:

7.39

PEG Ratio

TEL:

3.89

T:

0.31

PS Ratio

TEL:

3.30

T:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEL:

$18.52B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEL:

$6.55B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

TEL:

$4.47B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEL vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEL
TEL Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEL vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TELTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.89

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

-0.75

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

-1.59

+4.53

TEL vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEL Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEL and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TELTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

-0.75

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.28

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.12

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.38

0.00

Drawdowns

TEL vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEL drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEL and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TELTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.07%

-64.15%

-16.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.85%

-21.87%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.60%

-21.87%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.26%

-32.01%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.71%

-42.35%

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.66%

-21.87%

+5.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-15.72%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.08%

10.34%

-1.26%

Volatility

TEL vs. T - Volatility Comparison

TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 7.50%. This indicates that TEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TELTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

7.50%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.70%

17.57%

+10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.71%

21.98%

+11.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.02%

23.97%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

23.71%

+4.64%

Dividends

TEL vs. T - Dividend Comparison

TEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than T's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
T
AT&T Inc.
4.93%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
1.42%1.22%1.78%1.66%1.90%1.23%1.57%1.90%2.27%1.65%2.08%1.98%

Financials

TEL vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TE Connectivity Ltd. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
4.74B
33.47B
(TEL) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TEL and T have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEL has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to T (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEL dropped -81.07% vs T's -64.15%.

TEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEL and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer