TEL vs. C
TEL (TE Connectivity Ltd.) and C (Citigroup Inc.) are both stocks. TEL operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while C operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TEL returned 14.89%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for C. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TEL vs. C - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEL achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly lower than C's 15.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TEL having a 14.89% annualized return and C not far ahead at 15.14%.
TEL
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -9.00%
- 6M
- -11.51%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 14.89%
C
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 23.58%
- 1Y
- 74.17%
- 3Y*
- 44.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
TEL vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEL TE Connectivity Ltd. | -9.00% | 61.60% | 3.51% | 24.62% | -27.66% | 35.12% | 28.95% | 29.37% | -18.87% | 39.88% |
C Citigroup Inc. | 15.36% | 70.38% | 41.93% | 18.98% | -22.09% | 0.93% | -19.70% | 57.82% | -28.49% | 27.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEL and C is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TEL and C has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
TEL:
$60.65B
C:
$236.71B
TEL:
$9.78
C:
$8.65
TEL:
21.01
C:
15.41
TEL:
3.30
C:
1.44
TEL:
4.58
C:
1.24
TEL:
$18.52B
C:
$171.19B
TEL:
$6.55B
C:
$77.85B
TEL:
$4.47B
C:
$24.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEL vs. C — Risk / Return Rank
TEL
C
TEL vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEL | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 5.05 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 14.54 | -11.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEL | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.65 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.52 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.15 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
TEL vs. C - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEL drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEL and C.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEL | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -98.00% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -14.76% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -31.31% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.26% | -45.78% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.71% | -56.51% | +8.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.66% | -64.43% | +47.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.63% | -43.51% | +29.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 5.12% | +3.96% |
Volatility
TEL vs. C - Volatility Comparison
TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 8.43%. This indicates that TEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEL | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 8.43% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.70% | 22.84% | +4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.71% | 28.19% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.02% | 29.18% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 33.23% | -4.88% |
Dividends
TEL vs. C - Dividend Comparison
TEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than C's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C Citigroup Inc. | 1.80% | 1.99% | 3.10% | 4.04% | 4.51% | 3.38% | 3.31% | 2.40% | 2.96% | 1.29% | 0.71% | 0.31% |
TEL TE Connectivity Ltd. | 1.42% | 1.22% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.90% | 1.23% | 1.57% | 1.90% | 2.27% | 1.65% | 2.08% | 1.98% |
Financials
TEL vs. C - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TE Connectivity Ltd. and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TEL vs. C - Profitability Comparison
TEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
C - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
TEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
C - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.
TEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a net income of 855.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.
C - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TEL and C have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEL has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to C (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEL dropped -81.07% vs C's -98.00%.
C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEL and C
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer