TEKX vs. FCUS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TEKX (SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF) and FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TEKX returned 153.57% vs 92.36% for FCUS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEKX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FCUS.

Performance

TEKX vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEKX achieves a 78.46% return, which is significantly higher than FCUS's 47.20% return.

TEKX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 27.16%
• YTD: 78.46%
• 6M: 62.40%
• 1Y: 153.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCUS

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 47.20%
• 6M: 47.58%
• 1Y: 92.36%
• 3Y*: 36.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEKX vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TEKX SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF	78.46%	40.92%	14.80%
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	47.20%	13.69%	18.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TEKX and FCUS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	0.73

The correlation between TEKX and FCUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

TEKX vs. FCUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEKX	FCUS
Technology	46.4%	40.7%
Financial Services	26.9%	-
Industrials	17.2%	15.3%
Basic Materials	3.3%	10.1%
Utilities	3.1%	-
Energy	1.8%	18.2%
Communication Services	1.7%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	1.5%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	4.4%
Healthcare	-	6.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

TEKX vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEKX

TEKX Risk / Return Rank: 94
TEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
TEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 80
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEKX vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEKX	FCUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.13	2.73	+1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	3.04	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.43	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.62	5.25	+3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.47	18.78	+9.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEKX vs. FCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEKX Sharpe Ratio is 4.13, which is higher than the FCUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEKX and FCUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEKX	FCUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13	2.73	+1.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.92	1.10	+0.81

Drawdowns

TEKX vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEKX drawdown since its inception was -45.57%, which is greater than FCUS's maximum drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEKX and FCUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEKX	FCUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.57%	-39.89%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.92%	-17.70%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-1.91%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.28%	-7.54%	-2.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.42%	4.94%	+0.48%

Volatility

TEKX vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) have volatilities of 10.10% and 10.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEKX	FCUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.10%	10.15%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.57%	25.47%	+4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.44%	33.99%	+3.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.46%	29.98%	+14.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.46%	29.98%	+14.48%

TEKX vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEKX vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison

TEKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than FCUS's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	2.94%	4.33%	11.19%
TEKX SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF	0.20%	0.36%	3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEKX and FCUS in my portfolio?

TEKX and FCUS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEKX or FCUS?

FCUS has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to TEKX (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEKX dropped -45.57% vs FCUS's -39.89%.

Which ETF is better, TEKX or FCUS?

On 1-year performance, TEKX leads with 153.57% vs 92.36% for FCUS. On fees, TEKX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEKX or FCUS?

Over the 1-year period, TEKX has performed better with a 153.57% return vs 92.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEKX or FCUS?

TEKX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEKX or FCUS?

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.20% for TEKX.

What is the main difference between TEKX and FCUS?

They also come from different issuers: State Street Global Advisors and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TEKX and 0.79% for FCUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.