TEKX vs. FCUS
TEKX (SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF) and FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TEKX returned 141.02% vs 87.12% for FCUS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEKX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FCUS.
Performance
TEKX vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEKX achieves a 75.99% return, which is significantly higher than FCUS's 43.69% return.
TEKX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 75.99%
- 6M
- 68.06%
- 1Y
- 141.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCUS
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 43.69%
- 6M
- 40.12%
- 1Y
- 87.12%
- 3Y*
- 35.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEKX vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TEKX SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF | 75.99% | 40.92% | 16.00% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 43.69% | 13.69% | 17.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEKX and FCUS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between TEKX and FCUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
TEKX vs. FCUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TEKX
FCUS
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
TEKX
FCUS
Financial Services
TEKX
FCUS
-
Industrials
TEKX
FCUS
Utilities
TEKX
FCUS
-
Basic Materials
TEKX
FCUS
Communication Services
TEKX
FCUS
Consumer Cyclical
TEKX
FCUS
Energy
TEKX
FCUS
Consumer Defensive
TEKX
FCUS
Healthcare
TEKX
-
FCUS
Real Estate
TEKX
-
FCUS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEKX vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank
TEKX
FCUS
TEKX vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEKX | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.38 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.91 | 4.95 | +2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.68 | 17.01 | +8.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEKX vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEKX drawdown since its inception was -45.57%, which is greater than FCUS's maximum drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEKX and FCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEKX | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.57% | -39.89% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.92% | -17.70% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -4.25% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -7.50% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 5.14% | +0.37% |
Volatility
TEKX vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) is 11.51%, while Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that TEKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEKX | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.51% | 12.51% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.00% | 26.99% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.15% | 35.77% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.40% | 30.35% | +14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.40% | 30.35% | +14.05% |
TEKX vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEKX vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison
TEKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than FCUS's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 3.01% | 4.33% | 11.19% |
TEKX SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF | 0.20% | 0.36% | 3.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEKX and FCUS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCUS has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to TEKX (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEKX dropped -45.57% vs FCUS's -39.89%.
On 1-year performance, TEKX leads with 141.02% vs 87.12% for FCUS. On fees, TEKX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TEKX has been the lower-risk option at 11.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TEKX has performed better with a 141.02% return vs 87.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TEKX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.
FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.20% for TEKX.
They also come from different issuers: State Street Global Advisors and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TEKX and 0.79% for FCUS.
TEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEKX and FCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer