TEK vs. STHH
TEK (iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. TEK is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. Over the past year, TEK returned 61.28% vs 175.74% for STHH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
TEK vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEK achieves a 39.87% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 203.43% return.
TEK
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 13.74%
- YTD
- 39.87%
- 6M
- 37.87%
- 1Y
- 61.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 37.30%
- YTD
- 203.43%
- 6M
- 205.18%
- 1Y
- 175.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEK vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF | 39.87% | 39.76% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 203.43% | 16.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEK and STHH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.57 |
The correlation between TEK and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEK vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
TEK
STHH
TEK vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEK | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.54 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 5.22 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | 11.85 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEK | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 3.58 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 4.30 | -2.96 |
Drawdowns
TEK vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEK drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, smaller than the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEK and STHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEK | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.24% | -33.89% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.29% | -33.89% | +14.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -1.98% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -10.43% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 14.90% | -8.28% |
Volatility
TEK vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) is 9.38%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.56%. This indicates that TEK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEK | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 20.56% | -11.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.28% | 36.80% | -15.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.71% | 50.39% | -24.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.20% | 49.40% | -20.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.20% | 49.40% | -20.20% |
TEK vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEK vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
TEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than STHH's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.56% | 0.69% |
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF | 1.16% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEK and STHH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STHH has higher volatility (20.56%) compared to TEK (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEK dropped -28.24% vs STHH's -33.89%.
On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 175.74% vs 61.28% for TEK. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TEK has been the lower-risk option at 9.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 175.74% return vs 61.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TEK.
TEK has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.56% for STHH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TEK and 0.19% for STHH.
STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEK and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer