TEK vs. DGRO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TEK (iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. TEK is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past year, TEK returned 30.40% vs 24.21% for DGRO. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

TEK vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEK achieves a 21.44% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 13.39% return.

TEK

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -7.12%
• 6M: 19.04%
• YTD: 21.44%
• 1Y: 30.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.70%

DGRO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.97%
• 6M: 9.59%
• YTD: 13.39%
• 1Y: 24.21%
• 3Y*: 16.30%
• 5Y*: 11.08%
• 10Y*: 13.44%
• ALL TIME*: 12.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	$103.52M	$104.25M	$110.17M
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	$171.97K	$226.82K	$208.52K

TEK vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	21.44%	18.63%	2.63%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	13.39%	15.69%	-2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TEK and DGRO is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024	0.33

The correlation between TEK and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TEK vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEK	DGRO
Technology	85.8%	17.3%
Industrials	5.3%	11.3%
Communication Services	5.2%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	6.5%
Basic Materials	0.8%	2.5%
Financial Services	0.3%	20.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	11.9%
Energy	-	4.8%
Healthcare	-	17.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	7.3%

Return for Risk

TEK vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEK

TEK Risk / Return Rank: 35
TEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TEK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TEK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 91
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEK vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEK	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	2.44	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	3.55	-2.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.45	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	3.61	-2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	14.07	-10.53

TEK vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEK Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEK and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEK vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEK drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEK and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEK	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.24%	-35.10%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.55%	-6.47%	-16.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.72%	-1.35%	-14.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-3.41%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.82%	1.66%	+6.16%

Volatility

TEK vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.21%. This indicates that TEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEK	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.74%	3.21%	+11.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.28%	7.12%	+22.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.18%	9.61%	+23.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.24%	13.79%	+18.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.24%	16.58%	+15.66%

TEK vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEK vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

TEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than DGRO's 1.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.89%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	1.31%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEK and DGRO in my portfolio?

TEK and DGRO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEK or DGRO?

TEK has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to DGRO (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEK dropped -28.24% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which ETF is better, TEK or DGRO?

On 1-year performance, TEK leads with 30.40% vs 24.21% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEK or DGRO?

Over the 1-year period, TEK has performed better with a 30.40% return vs 24.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEK or DGRO?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEK or DGRO?

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.31% for TEK.

What is the main difference between TEK and DGRO?

TEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TEK and 0.08% for DGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.