PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TEGB.L (VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF) and IEVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating) are both Europe Equities funds - TEGB.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while IEVL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TEGB.L returned 10.76%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for IEVL.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEGB.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEVL.L.

Performance

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEGB.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TEGB.L is traded in GBP, while IEVL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEVL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEGB.L achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than IEVL.L's 13.06% return.

TEGB.L

1D
0.46%
1M
1.40%
YTD
6.39%
6M
8.89%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
—

IEVL.L

1D
0.12%
1M
2.70%
YTD
13.06%
6M
15.89%
1Y
35.67%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TEGB.L
VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF		6.39%27.36%6.93%17.13%-6.85%19.36%2.38%14.64%
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating		13.06%42.23%5.56%11.28%1.19%19.17%-3.59%10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TEGB.L and IEVL.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.87

The correlation between TEGB.L and IEVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TEGB.L
IEVL.L

Financial Services

35.8%
22.6%

Industrials

23.8%
17.0%

Technology

10.8%
12.2%

Healthcare

10.4%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
6.2%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.7%

Utilities

2.0%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
8.6%

Energy

1.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.6%

Financial Services

TEGB.L
35.8%
IEVL.L
22.6%

Industrials

TEGB.L
23.8%
IEVL.L
17.0%

Technology

TEGB.L
10.8%
IEVL.L
12.2%

Healthcare

TEGB.L
10.4%
IEVL.L
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TEGB.L
9.4%
IEVL.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

TEGB.L
3.2%
IEVL.L
6.2%

Communication Services

TEGB.L
2.8%
IEVL.L
3.7%

Utilities

TEGB.L
2.0%
IEVL.L
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

TEGB.L
1.3%
IEVL.L
8.6%

Energy

TEGB.L
1.1%
IEVL.L
5.1%

Real Estate

TEGB.L
0.9%
IEVL.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating

Often compared with TEGB.L:
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.LTEGB.L vs. GDGB.LTEGB.L vs. DFNG.LTEGB.L vs. EEIP.LTEGB.L vs. MMS.LTEGB.L vs. LGUK.LTEGB.L vs. SPEX.L
Often compared with IEVL.L:
IEVL.L vs. AINF.LIEVL.L vs. FBTU.LIEVL.L vs. IUCS.LIEVL.L vs. CSKR.LIEVL.L vs. 36BA.DEIEVL.L vs. IEMA.LIEVL.L vs. GLD

Return for Risk

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TEGB.L
TEGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TEGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TEGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
IEVL.L
IEVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEGB.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TEGB.LIEVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.41
2.68

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.05
3.60

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.48

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.42

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

12.68

-6.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEGB.L and IEVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TEGB.LIEVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.68

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.96

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.69

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.57

+0.10

Drawdowns

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEGB.L drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, smaller than the maximum IEVL.L drawdown of -34.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEGB.L and IEVL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TEGB.LIEVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.69%

-34.82%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-10.59%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

-16.33%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-16.48%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.82%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.87%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-6.05%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.86%

+0.23%

Volatility

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEGB.L) is 4.34%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that TEGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TEGB.LIEVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.85%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

11.06%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

13.52%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

15.24%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

17.13%

-0.13%

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IEVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEGB.L vs. IEVL.L - Dividend Comparison

TEGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while IEVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TEGB.L
VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF		2.69%2.41%2.78%2.65%2.85%2.52%2.38%3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, TEGB.L and IEVL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IEVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEGB.L.

TEGB.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IEVL.L tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEGB.L and 0.25% for IEVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEGB.L and IEVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer