TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L
TEGB.L (VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF) and ESIF.L (iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEGB.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ESIF.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TEGB.L returned 10.76%/yr vs 19.63%/yr for ESIF.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEGB.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIF.L.
Performance
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEGB.L achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly higher than ESIF.L's 3.13% return.
TEGB.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIF.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.63%
- 10Y*
- —
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEGB.L VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 6.39% | 27.36% | 6.93% | 17.13% | -6.85% | 19.36% | 2.64% |
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 54.55% | 20.09% | 18.81% | 3.59% | 20.48% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEGB.L and ESIF.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between TEGB.L and ESIF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
Industrials
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
Technology
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
Healthcare
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
Basic Materials
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
-
Communication Services
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
-
Utilities
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
-
Consumer Defensive
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
-
Energy
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
-
Real Estate
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L — Risk / Return Rank
TEGB.L
ESIF.L
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEGB.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEGB.L | ESIF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 2.20 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.21 | 7.65 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEGB.L | ESIF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.50 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.07 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.17 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEGB.L drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, which is greater than ESIF.L's maximum drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEGB.L and ESIF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEGB.L | ESIF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -23.55% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -11.68% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.33% | -14.26% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.25% | -23.55% | +5.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.84% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -4.12% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.36% | -0.27% |
Volatility
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEGB.L) is 4.34%, while iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that TEGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEGB.L | ESIF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.32% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 14.15% | -2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 17.09% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 18.32% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 18.22% | -1.22% |
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIF.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEGB.L vs. ESIF.L - Dividend Comparison
TEGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while ESIF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEGB.L VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 2.69% | 2.41% | 2.78% | 2.65% | 2.85% | 2.52% | 2.38% | 3.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEGB.L and ESIF.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIF.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIF.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEGB.L.
TEGB.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ESIF.L is Financials Equities. TEGB.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ESIF.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEGB.L and 0.18% for ESIF.L.
Find the right allocation for TEGB.L and ESIF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer